Politics is hypocrisy in action. Public life is all about hypocritical perceptions.
In the privacy of private conversations between men (and, some say, women) sex is likely to be the number one topic. The racier, the better. The juicier, the better. And, special accolades are given to the spinner of the sexual yarn if he (or, she) is the principal protagonist.
But, in public life, whether one is a political leader or a celebrity (think Charlie Sheen and Tiger Woods), sexual peccadilloes are frowned upon. There are clearly double standards to be applied.
From another perspective, some may regard lurid stories about leaders, be they political or business leaders, as positive news.
I can sense arched eyebrows and wide eyes at this point.
How can such news be positive?
Well, from a physiological point of view, such lurid stories suggest that the political or business leader in question is in good health. For, how can one "get it on" unless one can "rise" to the occasion?
A stressed-out person, let alone high-profile political or business leader, will exhibit the symptom of poor libido. He just can't get it on.
So, if we hear lurid stories about political or business leaders, it means that they are managing their stress pretty well and, they are in good physical health.
Posthumous stories of JFK having gotten it on faster than a rabbit in heat only reaffirmed his ability to get it on in leadership terms.
A sexually frustrated leader is not fun to be with, I'm sure.
Oh, yes, there is the other *yawn* boring perspective about morals and morality.
But, remember that for every poor, sexually deprived (and, depraved) person who may take umbrage at public figures who are accused of having sexual flings, there are many others who may feel that such news is evidence of libido and, therefore, physical fitness for high office.
Let the person who has no vice stand up to claim leadership.
Then, let the rest of us dispose of that person because there is a statistical certainty that under such leadership Life will be worse than Death.
No one likes a killjoy for a leader, whether in politics or in business.
I'm just saying....
I can sense arched eyebrows and wide eyes at this point.
How can such news be positive?
Well, from a physiological point of view, such lurid stories suggest that the political or business leader in question is in good health. For, how can one "get it on" unless one can "rise" to the occasion?
A stressed-out person, let alone high-profile political or business leader, will exhibit the symptom of poor libido. He just can't get it on.
So, if we hear lurid stories about political or business leaders, it means that they are managing their stress pretty well and, they are in good physical health.
Posthumous stories of JFK having gotten it on faster than a rabbit in heat only reaffirmed his ability to get it on in leadership terms.
A sexually frustrated leader is not fun to be with, I'm sure.
Oh, yes, there is the other *yawn* boring perspective about morals and morality.
But, remember that for every poor, sexually deprived (and, depraved) person who may take umbrage at public figures who are accused of having sexual flings, there are many others who may feel that such news is evidence of libido and, therefore, physical fitness for high office.
Let the person who has no vice stand up to claim leadership.
Then, let the rest of us dispose of that person because there is a statistical certainty that under such leadership Life will be worse than Death.
No one likes a killjoy for a leader, whether in politics or in business.
I'm just saying....